The Role of Data Creates Opportunities and Challenges for Public Policy Literature Study

Remond Joey  Paywala

Authors

Remond Joey Paywala Universitas Negeri Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Keywords:

Data, Kebijakan, Publik

Abstract

In the last decade, data approaches to policy design have spread across jurisdictions and policy areas. While the number of studies on successful data interventions continues to increase, experts report unwanted side effects and other forms of policy failure associated with behavioral public policy. This paper aims to gain a better understanding of the various mechanisms of behavior change and their impact on policy success or failure. The failure of behavioral public policy appears to be the result of a deficit in understanding the relationship between cognitive and social mechanisms at multiple levels. It is argued that systematically linking the mechanisms underlying behavior change will help us to gain a better understanding of the biases and unintended effects of policy design. The method used in this research is a literature study. This research is a literature study in accordance with the guidelines. It was carried out in various stages: development of a review protocol, identification of inclusion and exclusion criteria, keyword searches in bibliographic databases for relevant studies, and critical assessment. Describe the details of each step taken and the method used.

Author Biography

Remond Joey Paywala, Universitas Negeri Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Department of Public Administration

References

Anisetti, M., Ardagna, C., Bellandi, V., Cremonini, M., Frati, F., & Damiani, E. (2018). Privacy-aware Big Data Analytics as a service for public health policies in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.019

Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., & Touzard, J. M. (2017). Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies. World Development, 98, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004

Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878

Branham, J. A., & Jessee, S. A. (2017). Modeling spending preferences & public policy. Electoral Studies, 49, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.007

Calderoni, L., Maio, D., & Palmieri, P. (2012). Location-aware Mobile Services for a Smart City: Design, Implementation and Deployment. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000300008

Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K., Science, T. T.-P. C., & 2013, U. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050913000719

Dantas, M. K., Oliveira, L. R. de, Ferolla, L. M., Paschoalotto, M. A. C., Lopes, J. E. F., Passador, J. L., & Passador, C. S. (2017). Cross-sectoral assessment of public policies in health and the environment: Scenario of the municipalities in the state of Sao Paulo. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.003

Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). The data revolution and economic analysis. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/674019

Faivre d’Arcier, B. (2014). Measuring the performance of urban public transport in relation to public policy objectives. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.033

Giest, S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: fad or fasttrack? Policy Sciences, 50(3), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9293-1

Gil-Garcia, J. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions.

Höchtl, J., Parycek, P., & Schöllhammer, R. (2016). Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era. Taylor & Francis, 26(1–2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187

Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2012). Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In Heuristics and Biases (pp. 49–81). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004

Keele, B. K.-, UK, U., University, K., & 2004, U. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews.

Kimble, C., Organizational, G. M.-G. B. and, & 2015, undefined. (2015). Big Data and Business Intelligence: Debunking the Myths. Wiley Online Library, 35(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21642

McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy.

Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309104175

Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533

Mergel, I. (2016). Big Data in Public Affairs Education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002243

Polet, P., Vanderhaegen, F., & Zieba, S. (2010). An iterative learning system to learn from human errors in transport systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 11(PART 1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.3182/20100831-4-fr-2021.00010

Schoen, F. J. (2010). Cardiovascular pathology: Maturation of a discipline and the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology. Cardiovascular Pathology, 19(4), 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2010.02.007

Stough, R., & Mcbride, D. (2014). Big data and U.S. public policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(4), 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12083