The Importance of Public Participation in Performance-Based Budgeting in Indonesia
Keywords:
Performance, Budgeting, Public Participation, Literature ReviewAbstract
Public participation is defined as participation in all processes and stages of decision-making, whether manipulative or spontaneous, in preparing the public sector budget to help the government achieve financial goals and improve coordination between departments within the government. Help create efficiency and equity in providing public goods and services through a prioritization process. The research method used qualitative with literature review studies. Secondary data analysis was carried out using triangulation techniques according to the concept of performance in public budgeting. The results show that performance is supported by good cooperation between community participation and stakeholder involvement in order to create good governance in public budgeting. In addition, it is also essential to supervise, monitor, and evaluate the budget to create quality government performance. So in its implementation, public budgeting-based performance in Indonesia must prioritize increasing professionalism in providing public services so that social justice can be created in the context of the welfare of the Indonesian people in the future.
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Andrews, M. (2010). Good Government Means Different Things in Different Countries. Governance, 23(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0491.2009.01465.X
Baker, E. (2015). The potential impact of positive organizational behavior on the library working environment : an introduction for library administrators. Advance in Library Administration and Organization, 34. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-0671201534
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.
Boocock, M., & Grahame, D. (2003). Qualitative interview studies: learning through experience. Venture Capital, Islamic Finance and SMEs, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609373-8
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.
Carmeli, A., & Josman, Z. E. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: Clarifying relations between the two domains. Human Performance, 19(4), 403–419.
Chahal, H., Jyoti, J., & Rani, A. (2016). The Effect of Perceived High-performance Human Resource Practices on Business Performance: Role of Organizational Learning. Global Business Review, 17, 107S-132S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916631193
Chamchong, P. (2016). The Initiation and Sustainability of Collaboration Between Small Local Governments : A Comparative Analysis of England and Thailand (Issue February) [Thesis]. The University of Birmingham.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third Edition). SAGE.
Galvan, J. L., & Galvan, M. C. (2017). Writing literature reviews : A guide for the student of the social and behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Routledge.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction.
Greene, R. J. (2015). Reward performance? What else? Compensation & Benefits Review, 47(3), 103–106.
Grundy-Warr, C., Peachey, K., & Perry, M. (1999). Fragmented Integration in the Singapore-Indonesian Border Zone: Southeast Asia's 'Growth Triangle' Against the Global Economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00197
Ishii, T. (2022). Coalition Government or Federalism? The Relationship between Policy Distance and Institutional Design. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4076606
Kelly, A., & Westoby, P. (2018). Participatory development practice: Using traditional and contemporary frameworks. In Participatory Development Practice. Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449982
Koopmans, L. (2014). Measuring individual work performance. Bodywork.
Kurniasih, D., Setyoko, P. I., & Imron, M. (2016). Kinerja kelembagaan program sanitasi lingkungan berbasis masyarakat (SLBM). Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 29(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.20473/MKP.V29I12016.14-21
Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance measurement used in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190.
Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement. Public Management Review, 15(6), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.698857
Nordholt, H. S. (2008). Identity Politics, Citizenship and the Soft State in Indonesia: An Essay. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14203/JISSH.V1I1.1
Ortega, E. M. P., Saez, P. Z., & cortes, E. C. (2010). Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance? Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.015
Prastyawan, A., & Isbandono, P. (2018). The role of local governments in traditional market revitalization. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953(1).
Rosati, J. A. (1981). Developing a Systematic Decision-Making Framework: Bureaucratic Politics in Perspective. World Politics, 33(2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010371
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global job performance ratings: a policy-capturing approach. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 66–80.
Samin, R. (2021). Central-local government dalam manajemen bencana pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia. Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.37329/GANAYA.V4I2.1419
Samnuzulsari, T. & Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2016). Penganggaran partisipatif di Kabupaten Bima Nusa Tenggara Barat. Dialektika Publik, 2(1), 43-51.
Shipton, H., Budhwar, P. S., & Crawshaw, J. (2012). HRM, Organizational Capacity for Change, and Performance: A Global Perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 54(6), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/TIE.21503
Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2005). Performance Concepts and Performance Theory. Psychological Management of Individual Performance, October 2017, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013419.ch1
Stelzenmüller, V., Cormier, R., Gee, K., Shucksmith, R., Gubbins, M., Yates, K. L., Morf, A., Nic Aonghusa, C., Mikkelsen, E., Tweddle, J. F., Peccu, E., Kannen, A., & Clarke, S. A. (2021). Evaluation of marine spatial planning requires fit-for-purpose monitoring strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 278, 111545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.111545
Teisman, G. R. (2000). Models for research into decision-making processes: On phases, streams and decision-making rounds. Public Administration, 78(4), 937–956.
Usman, E., & Paranoan, S. (2014). Anggaran Partisipatif dalam Menunjang Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 4(1), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.18202/JAMAL.2013.04.7187
Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2020). Monitoring and Evaluation in a Chaotic and complex Government Interventions' Environment. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4102/APSDPR
Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2016). Implementasi dan evaluasi kebijakan publik. Tanjungpinang: UMRAH Press.
Yudithia, Y., & Mahadiansar, M. (2019). Perilaku organisasi positif dalam kinerja; Sebuah konsep dan teori. UMRAH Press.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (3rd ed.). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Policy and Social Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
